NHS FPX 6008 Assessment 3 Developing an Implementation Plan
University:
Capella University
NHS FPX 6008 Assessment 3 Developing an Implementation Plan
Paper Instructions
Develop a 6-7-page implementation plan for the initiative you proposed in Assessment
- Include a budget for material, staffing, and capital costs over the first five years of the initiative, as well as projected earnings. In addition, include a timeline, an organizational impact analysis, and an explanation of the effects of environmental changes on the initiative.
Introduction
Note Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you may be expected to create budgets and implementation plans to ensure that initiatives to take advantage of economic opportunities for the organization are rolled out successfully and can be sustained over multiple years. Additionally, it is important to be able to envision how an initiative could be implemented in different contexts and for different purposes to ensure that the investment remains a viable and positive asset to your organization or care setting.
Instructions
Develop a thorough implementation plan for the economic initiative you proposed in Assessment 1. Your plan must include a budget for material, staffing, and capital costs over the first five years of the initiative, as well as projected earnings. In addition, include
- A plan and timeline for rolling out the initiative.
- An analysis of how the initiative may impact other aspects of the organization or care setting.
- An explanation how the initiative can remain viable in the face of environmental changes.
- Sufficient relevant and credible supporting evidence.
Note Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft implementation plan to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24-48 hours for receiving feedback.
The requirements for your implementation plan, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
- Create a budget for expected costs and earnings over the first five years of your proposed initiative.
- What are the expected material, staffing, and capital costs of your proposed initiative over its first five years?
- What are the projected earnings for your organization or care setting over the first five years of your economic initiative?
- How does this budget take into account the findings and feedback you received on your business case?
- What assumptions are you basing your budget on?
Create an implementation plan for your proposed initiative that enables achievement of quality or service improvements in an ethical and culturally equitable way.
- Did you create a timeline for the rollout?
- How will you work with relevant stakeholders to ensure that your economic initiative is implemented successfully and sustained?
- How will you ensure that the rollout is conducted in an ethical and culturally equitable manner?
- How will you ensure that the desired quality or service improvements your economic initiative will achieve are on track during and after implementation?
Analyze the impact of your proposed initiative, once implemented, on other aspects of your organization or care setting and ways in which negative impacts could be mitigated.
- What other aspects of your organization or care setting may be positively or negatively impacted by the implementation of your proposed initiative?
- How will these other aspects of your organization or care setting be affected? (For example, increased workload on a testing department, borrowing of staff hours from another part of the care setting, or better communication with the community.)
- How could you mitigate at least some of the negative effects on other aspects of your organization or care setting?
Explain your strategies for ensuring that your proposed initiative can remain a viable asset to the organization or care setting in the face of dynamic environmental forces.
- What are the environmental risks to your economic initiative?
- How could your initiative, or aspects of it, still be a viable benefit to your organization or care setting if the environment shifts in unpredictable ways?
- What strategies would you propose implementing to keep all, or a portion of, your initiative a viable net benefit to your organization or care setting?
Justify the relevance and significance of the quantitative and qualitative economic, financial, and scholarly evidence you used throughout your plan to support your recommendations.
- How is the evidence relevant to your organization or care setting?
- How is the evidence relevant to your proposed economic initiative?
- How does the evidence illustrate a solution that has been successful in the past?
- How does the evidence illustrate that a recommendation is the best course of action for your situation and organization or care setting?
Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
Proofread your document before you submit it to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your implementation plan.
Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Example Assessment
You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
- Assessment 3 Example [PDF].
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Format
Format your implementation plan using current APA style. Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] to help you in writing and formatting your implementation plan. Be sure to include:
- A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.
- A running head on all pages.
- Appropriate section headings.
Length
- Your implementation plan should be 6-7 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Supporting evidence
- Cite 3-5 authoritative and scholarly resources to support your implementation plan. Be sure that your sources include specific economic data.
Portfolio Prompt
- You may choose to save your implementation plan to your ePortfolio.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment scoring guide criteria
Competency 1
- Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.
- Create a budget for expected costs and earnings over the first five years of a proposed initiative.
- Analyze the impact of a proposed initiative, once implemented, on other aspects of an organization or care setting and ways in which negative impacts could be mitigated.
Competency 2
- Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.
- Create an implementation plan for a proposed initiative that enables achievement of quality or service improvements in an ethical and culturally equitable way.
Competency 3
- Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.
- Justify the relevance and significance of quantitative and qualitative economic, financial, and scholarly evidence used throughout an implementation plan to support recommendations.
Competency 4
- Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization’s resources and its ability to provide quality care.
- Explain strategies for ensuring that a proposed economic initiative can remain a viable asset to an organization or care setting in the face of dynamic environmental forces.
Competency 5
- Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.
- Write concisely and directly using active voice.
- Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour.
Sample Answer
Health care organizations need progressive development to meet service delivery and sustainability goals. Accordingly, it is advisable to exploit economic opportunities at the micro and macro levels to increase revenue as situations necessitate. The economic opportunity proposed to the senior management is a partnership with the local association of greengrocers. The association is routinely involved in community-based health programs, including awareness on healthy living and eating and home visitations to identify at-risk populations.
Partnering with the association will expand the program’s scope since, through the partnership, a larger population will be reached, screened for health problems, and referred to the health care facility for advanced health care. This paper presents the implementation plan. Focus areas include the budget, the plan, impacts of the initiative, strategies to respond to environmental forces, and significance of evidence.
Budget for the Proposed Initiative
A cost-benefit analysis of the initiative was conducted to determine its feasibility. During the analysis, a key focus area was the costs involved and returns over five years (2022-2026). Through the project, the organization is expected to generate additional revenue to run its current programs and support its expansion efforts as situations obligate. The budget for the proposed partnership includes the costs from March 2022, when all the foundation plans are expected to be complete. It further projects the revenue expected to be earned over the five years (until March 2026).
The revenue earned through the partnership will be generated from three primary sources. The first main source is patient services’ revenue that will increase progressively over the five years.
According to Mannion and Davies (2018), patients’ visits in a health care organization depend on trust and the quality of care received along with the health care culture. Excellent quality leads to satisfaction hence more patient referrals. The same concept is expected to apply to this initiative. Awareness and screening programs will encourage patients to seek health care services from the organization leading to more patient visits. The annual revenue over the five years has been calculated by multiplying the number of expected patients (200 monthly) with consultation charges and average medication costs. Estimations give $20,000 in the first year. Like many other revenue-generating activities, more revenue is expected over the years as the patients’ volume increases. As a result, revenue from the second to the fifth year will rise gradually from $30,000 to $70,000 (Appendix 1).
The other major revenue source is staff salaries. The staff to be involved includes nurse practitioners, medical assistants, nursing assistants, and support staff. The nursing staff will collaborate with a full-time physician at the organization to evaluate health care status in the community and the responses required. The staff involved will be remunerated depending on the engagement level since they will also be involved in regular organization activities. The salary earned is expected to increase gradually as more health care staff joins the initial team. The projected first-year earning is $5,000, which will gradually increase to $25,000 by the fifth year (2026).
The organization is also expected to earn substantially from saved costs. From a financial perspective, the initiative will enable the organization to save some of the current health care delivery costs. A suitable example is advertisement (media coverage) costs that will be replaced with awareness and education options of the initiative. The other cost is the community health education that the organization conducts every six months. Saved costs are expected to be constant over the five years at $3,500 annually.
The initiative will also incur some costs to establish and run over the years. One of the key cost areas is education and awareness materials. A significant part of the initiative involves educating the target population on the importance of healthy eating and living and adopting appropriate healthy behaviors. The resources involved will cost approximately $3,600 and are expected to remain the same over the years. Other costs involve technologies and screening that will consume up to $8,000 and $3,500, respectively. Telehealth will be a major part of the technologies involved. The team will also require orientation and training, a one-off expense at $1,500 (Appendix 1).
Overall, the total costs involved will be $33,100 in the first year, gradually reducing to $28,621.09 in the fifth year. Total costs to run the program over the five years will be $182,045.32. The gross revenue expected is $353,660.86, giving a total benefit of $171,615.54 (Appendix 1). The net benefit implies that the organization will make substantial revenue by engaging in the initiative. The revenue will be instrumental in its capacity building and expansion efforts and other initiatives to improve care, such as adopting technologies and recruiting more nursing staff.
Implementation Plan- Rolling Out the Initiative
Table 1: Timeline
Activity | Duration |
Management approval | 3 weeks |
Stakeholder engagement | 1 month |
Orientation training | 2 weeks |
Preparation and plan’s roll out | 3 weeks |
Implementation implies taking the necessary actions to achieve a project’s goals. The first step, vital in goal achievement, is setting a timeline. The initiative does not involve building new facilities and should not take long before rolling out to the public. Since the association of greengrocers is open to partnerships and the organization has engaged in similar partnerships before, management approval is expected to take a maximum of three weeks.
Stakeholder engagement will follow the management’s approval to give the initiative a better chance to succeed. Stakeholders, internal and external, affect the outcomes of health projects depending on their support and resistance. Engaging stakeholders reduces resistance and increases buy-in (Quanbeck, 2019). The organization’s management, nurses, and support staff are key internal stakeholders whose support is needed for the initiative to succeed. To earn their support, an organizational presentation will be held detailing the project’s benefits and its impacts. Regular meetings will also be held to update stakeholders on the progress.
After the management approval and stakeholder engagement, it is crucial to ensure that the team is ready to implement community-based health care activities and handle patients and communities ethically and in a culturally-sensitive manner. As a result, the team will undergo orientation training to ensure that everyone understands the initiative’s focus areas and the ethical, legal, and professional principles to apply throughout the initiative. For instance, the staff will be educated on treating people without discrimination, particularly cultural, ethnic, and gender-based discrimination.
The team’s composition will also be diverse in all major aspects to ensure that it is ready to interact with people in a culturally sensitive and linguistically appropriate manner (Jongen et al., 2018). With the team ready and focused on achieving the set goals, the initiative’s rollout will be in March 2022. The organization’s team will join the association of greengrocer’s team and commence the initiative through joint leadership from leaders representing each side. Rolling out the plan is expected to commence the organization’s growth and sustainability efforts.
Impacts of the Initiative and Mitigating Negative Impacts
The initiative is expected to achieve three primary goals. The first goal is expanding the organization’s revenue base through earnings from more patient services. The organization will serve more patients due to increased referrals. The nursing staff will be remunerated through the same program to supplement its current income. Secondly, the organization will save the organization some current costs. Thirdly, it will commence the organization’s journey towards sustainability through partnerships in community health development.
Despite these efforts and well-outlined plans, some areas of uncertainty can adversely affect the implementation and cause some delays. For instance, it is uncertain whether the team will require further training once it joins the association of greengrocer’s team. Also, it cannot be accurately established whether the current financial reserve will sustain the efforts for one year before the organization starts earning any substantial revenue. The number of nursing staff to be involved in the initiative can only be estimated too.
Hence, it is unknown whether more staff will be required, which can adversely affect operations in the organization before more staff is recruited. The organization should set a higher proportion of the current financial reserve towards the program to address these uncertainties. It should also be open to including more volunteers in the program as support staff. The search for donor support should be intensified to increase financial security since financial problems are the most significant risk.
Strategies to Maintain Viability amid Dynamic Environmental Forces
The initiative is not immune to environmental forces that could adversely affect the project’s viability. For instance, other organizations in the area could engage in similar programs and give the target population more options for health care services within its locality. Also, new health care organizations are likely to emerge and reduce the relevance of the partnership. Avoiding the adverse outcomes associated with these forces requires a multifaceted approach. The organization must intensify awareness about the partnership to ensure that the community is aware of it as long as it exists. Secondly, the partnership should be unique in its response to population health needs.
For instance, the use of telehealth should be intensified since the technology reduces the need for physical visits to health care organizations (Haleem et al., 2021). Some health care staff should be permanently based in the community to ensure that the target population can get home-based care timely and conveniently. The organization’s healthcare staff should be continuously trained about the program essentials to ensure that there is ready staff to deploy in the field if a need arises.
Relevance of the Evidence
The implementation plan uses quantitative and qualitative economic, financial, and scholarly evidence to support recommendations. Regarding economic and financial evidence, the five-year projections exemplify an initiative whose revenues exceed costs by a significant margin. From a financial perspective, an organization is justified to engage in an initiative if it helps it make profits. The scholarly evidence used throughout the implementation plan illustrates the outcomes of key decisions and interventions that the organization could adopt in various phases of the initiative. Overall, the evidence defends the proposal as a viable economic opportunity if executed appropriately.
Conclusion
The proposed budget shows that the initiative will be economically viable for the organization. With maximum stakeholder support and the right leadership, the initiative will benefit the organization in the short term and long term. However, innovative strategies must be developed to overcome emerging environmental forces and eventualities. Generally, it is an excellent opportunity to enable the organization to serve a large patient base and expand its potential to offer community-based and home-based health care services when critically needed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
References
- Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Telemedicine for healthcare Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International, 2, 100117. https //doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117
- Jongen, C., McCalman, J., & Bainbridge, R. (2018). Health workforce cultural competency interventions A systematic scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 232. https //doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3001-5
- Mannion, R., & Davies, H. (2018). Understanding organisational culture for healthcare quality improvement. Bmj, 363. https //doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4907
- Quanbeck, A. (2019). Using stakeholder values to promote implementation of an evidence-based mobile health intervention for addiction treatment in primary care settings. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(6), e13301. https //doi.org/10.2196/13301
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour