BHA FPX 4102 Assessment 4 Conflict Resolution

Paper Instructions

Develop a 2-page plan to identify the causes of organizational conflict, explain how conflict affects an organization, and select a conflict resolution style to use. Explain conflict negotiation strategies and determine the likely outcomes.

 

We Work Hard So That You Don’t

We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour.

Conflict is a dispute between people that may adversely affect an organization. In the workplace, it often entails individual agendas conflicting with collective objectives (Stepanova et al., 2019). Conflict management seeks to settle disputes with favorable results. The organization’s senior leadership has been in disagreement for almost a year, with allegations of prejudice related to ethnicity, culture, social standing, and religion. This conflict hinders individuals from effectively collaborating with the organization. This paper aims to identify organizational conflict causes, explain its impact, select a resolution style, explain negotiation strategies, and predict potential outcomes.

Contributing Factors

Organizational conflicts may arise from bias, stereotyping, insufficient diversity, communication obstacles, implicit bias, inequitable policies, historical and sociological contexts, inadequate conflict resolution strategies, cultural insensitivity, and reluctance to change. Prejudice, stereotyping, and insufficient diversity may result in discriminatory conduct and inequitable treatment (Keashly et al., 2020). Inequitable policies foster an atmosphere of disparity, while historical and sociological factors may affect organizational dynamics. Insufficient dispute resolution procedures may exacerbate conflicts, while cultural insensitivity may result in improper remarks or discriminatory behaviors. Addressing these contributing factors is essential for cultivating a pleasant work atmosphere.

Impact

Internal conflict within an organization may profoundly affect employees, clients, and management, yielding both detrimental and beneficial consequences. Unresolved conflict among personnel may diminish morale and productivity while also elevating turnover rates; conversely, constructive conflict can improve problem-solving and foster team cohesiveness (Schweinsberg et al., 2021). Internal disagreements may result in subpar service for customers, diminishing satisfaction and loyalty, yet proficient conflict resolution may enhance service quality. Leadership is influenced by conflict management; bad handling may erode a leader’s credibility, while excellent resolution can enhance their authority and improve decision-making. The management of conflict ultimately influences organizational culture, perhaps cultivating a hostile atmosphere or encouraging transparency and ongoing improvement.

Conflict Resolution Style

Collaborative Problem Solving, referred to as the Integrative or Win-Win Approach, is the most appropriate dispute resolution method for organizations facing allegations of prejudice related to race, culture, social standing, and religion. This method entails transparent communication, empathy, and comprehension of the viewpoints of all parties concerned (Schweinsberg et al., 2021). The processes include creating a secure atmosphere, promoting open communication, recognizing underlying challenges, generating possible solutions, assessing options, reaching a consensus on a plan, and evaluating its efficacy. This method guarantees a reciprocal solution that answers the interests of all parties and provides responsibility and follow-up.

Conflict Negotiation Strategies

Strategies for negotiating conflicts related to bias claims inside organizations include interest-based negotiation, mediation, collaborative problem-solving, transformational mediation, and arbitration. Interest-based bargaining fosters transparent communication and inclusion, while collaborative problem-solving amplifies marginalized perspectives (Stepanova et al., 2019). Nonetheless, arbitration may fail to resolve the underlying reasons for bias and might result in discontent among the parties involved. Strategies that prioritize cooperation and comprehension are essential for managing delicate disputes since arbitration may fail to resolve the underlying reasons for prejudice.

Outcome

The conflict resolution strategies above may profoundly impact employee morale, customer happiness, and the reputation of leadership. Collaborative strategies often cultivate a favorable atmosphere, improving work happiness and service quality. However, compromise may result in ambivalent sentiments among employees and possibly enduring trust concerns. Accommodating may provide temporary solutions but might erode worker morale over time while competing can foster a hostile environment and increase turnover (Stepanova et al., 2019). Evading disputes often results in irritation and disengagement, adversely affecting productivity and service quality. Effective conflict resolution improves organizational culture and leadership credibility, while ineffective techniques may diminish trust and satisfaction among employees and clients.

Conclusion

Organizational conflict may be detrimental owing to personal motivations and variables such as bias, insufficient diversity, communication obstacles, and ineffective settlement processes. Collaborative problem-solving is the most effective method, fostering transparent communication and empathy. Negotiating techniques such as interest-based negotiating and transformational mediation confront prejudice. Effective conflict management enhances organizational culture and leadership reputation, while ineffective techniques may diminish trust and satisfaction.

References

  • Keashly, L., Minkowitz, H., & Nowell, B. L. (2020). Conflict, conflict resolution, and workplace bullying. In CRC Press eBooks (pp. 331–361). https //doi.org/10.1201/9780429462528-12
  • Schweinsberg, M., Thau, S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2021). Negotiation impasses types, causes, and resolutions. Journal of Management, 48(1), 49–76. https //doi.org/10.1177/01492063211021657
  • Stepanova, O., Polk, M., & Saldert, H. (2019). Understanding mechanisms of conflict resolution beyond collaboration an interdisciplinary typology of knowledge types and their integration in practice. Sustainability Science, 15(1), 263–279. https //doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00690-z

We Work Hard So That You Don’t

We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour