DNP 825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
University:
GCU
DNP 825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
Paper Instructions
Assessment Description
This purpose of this assignment is to increase familiarity with the IRB submission process.
In this assignment, you will create a mock GCU Quality Improvement (QI) IRB submission. You will be required to submit your actual DPI-Committee-Approved DPI Project Proposal to iRIS in the DNP-960 course, and so to prepare, you will begin reviewing the submission process and all requisite IRB documents in this assignment.
However, you will not be submitting an IRB proposal for your DPI Project at this point in time. This assignment is a practice opportunity to ensure you are aware of the QI-IRB submission process at your clinical/practicum site and that you are familiar with the types of documents required.
General Requirements
Use the following information to assist you in executing the correct procedures for timely, successful completion of the assignment
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Procedures
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment
Work with your preceptor/mentor at your clinical/practicum site to understand the DPI Project approval process for IRB and quality improvement projects. This includes timelines, committees involved (IRB, Nursing Research, Quality Improvement), and the authorizing signatures required.
Ensure you address timeframes and submission documents required in addition to the approval process for a quality improvement DPI Project to be conducted at your clinical/practicum site.
Review the resources within the IRB Documents folder, located in the DC Network. Navigate to the IRB Documents folder by selecting DNP Community, DNP Program Documents, DNP-960, and then the IRB Documents folder.
Read the “IRB Documents Checklist for DNP Learners,” located in the DNP-960 folder.
Review the IRB Submission Training Videos for iRIS. With your instructor, determine which documents you will need to submit for your IRB application based on the “IRB Documents Checklist for DNP Learners,” located in the DNP-960 folder.
Use the following document templates as needed informed consent, site authorization letter, recruitment script, confidentiality statement, conflict of interest form, and HIPAA authorization form, located in the DNP-960 Folder/IRB Documents folder.
Directions for Submission
Construct a 250-500-word Clinical/Practicum Site QI-IRB Report that outlines the steps in the DPI Project approval process for IRB and quality improvement projects at your clinical site.
Upload the following to the assignment dropbox Your completed DNP-10 Strategic Points document (including all updated required revisions from your DNP-815A course), sample site authorization letter, (identifying the authorizing official), DNP Committee Approval Form, QI Determination Form, and any other IRB documents that pertain to your DPI Project.
Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour.
Sample Answer
Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
The promotion of evidence-based practice is important in nursing practice. Nurse practitioners and other nurses engage in research or quality improvement initiatives to identify new practices that can be adopted to enhance patient and nursing outcomes (Antonio et al., 2018).
In doing so, they must obtain approvals from the institutional review boards relevant to their institutions and practice. The review boards ensure the adoption of ethical practices that safeguard the interests and rights of the participants in a research or quality improvement initiative.
Some of the considerations in the review process includes determining if the researchers have adhered to protocols for ensuring safety, quality, confidentiality, and privacy of data (Hicks et al., 2021; Marzinsky & Smith-Miller, 2019). Therefore, this research paper examines the process of obtaining institutional review board approval for a research or quality improvement initiative in my practice site.
My practice site is a tertiary institution that provides both general and specialized care. It is also a training institution for nurses and doctors. As a result, it supports different forms of research or quality improvement initiatives with the aim of contributing to the use of best practice interventions in the patient care process.
The hospital has an institutional review board tasked with the responsibility of approving any research or quality improvement initiatives being undertaken in the institution (Lapid et al., 2019). The process of the institutional review board to approval stage for a project has several steps.
The first step in the process is submitting the proposed research or quality improvement initiative to a lead supervisor in one’s specialty. The supervisor assesses the clarity, relevance, project’s alignment with the organization’s mission, and need in the organization.
The supervisor also offers feedback on whether the project meets the threshold for its progress to the institutional review board or not and need for any revisions. Once cleared by the supervisor, the next step entails submitting the project proposal to the institutional review board.
The submission must meet the requirements that have been set by the board. Practitioners can access the requirements and necessary forms to be filled online. The submission is also done online.
The third step entails the initial assessment of the project proposal by the institutional review board. The practitioner must ensure that specific areas of focus are contained in the submission. They include background, purpose/goal, design, procedures, population, risk, and results utilization.
The board determines the ethics of the project, need, and potential issues that must be considered before its undertaking (Hicks et al., 2021; Resnik, 2021). The board members may contact the researcher to seek further clarification before making its decision. It then communicates its decisions to the researcher.
The decisions are either the project is approved to be undertaken, to be revised, or declined. One is given specific deadlines to meet should they be required to revise the submission. They should submit the revised proposals with a written explanations in a separate document detailing all the changes made.
Once approved, the institutional review board provides a certification that acts as a permit to undertake research or a quality improvement initiative in the organization (Lapid et al., 2019; Marzinsky & Smith-Miller, 2019).
Conclusion
The approval of a quality improvement initiative or research in my practice site is a rigorous process. One must follow the developed procedures to be followed before undertaking the investigation. The institutional review board has the powers to approve or decline one’s submission. Therefore, I believe that the existence of these mechanisms safeguards the rights of those who will be affected by an initiative or research.
References
Antonio, S., Ana, F., & Elena, U. (2018). Ethics in Research Practice and Innovation. IGI Global.
Hicks, R. W., Hines, K., & Henson, B. (2021). Demystifying the institutional review board. AORN Journal, 114(4), 309–318.
Lapid, M. I., Clarke, B. L., & Wright, R. S. (2019). Institutional review boards What clinician researchers need to know. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94(3), 515–525.
Marzinsky, A., & Smith-Miller, C. A. (2019). Nurse research and the institutional review board Learn how the IRB process works to ensure participant safety and quality research. American Nurse Today, 14(10), 20–25.
Resnik, D. B. (2021). Standards of evidence for institutional review board decision-making. Accountability in Research, 28(7), 428–455.
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour