NR 505 Week 1 Area of Interest in NP
University:
Chamberlain University
NR 505 Week 1 Area of Interest in NP
Paper Instructions
Preparing the Assignment
Discussion Criteria
1. Application of Course Knowledge
The student’s initial post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question. Initial post must be posted by Wednesday at 11 59pm MT. Two resources must be used in your initial post. One from the weekly reading or lesson and one outside source.
2. Engagement in Meaningful
Dialogue
The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
a. Peer Response
The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
- A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
- The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
- The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11 59 p.m. MT.
- The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
b. Faculty Response
The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.
- A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
- The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
- Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11 59 p.m. MT.
- This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
3. Integration of Evidence
The student post provides support from a minimum of one scholarly in-text citation with a matching reference AND assigned readings OR online lessons, per discussion topic per week. Two resources total and to count must be an in-text citation in your initial post.
a. What is a scholarly resource?
A scholarly resource is one that comes from a professional, peer-reviewed publication (e.g., journals and government reports such as those from the FDA or CDC).
- Contains references for sources cited
- Written by a professional or scholar in the field and indicates credentials of the author(s)
- Is no more than 5 years old for clinical or research article
b. What is not considered a scholarly resource?
- Newspaper articles and layperson literature (e.g., Readers Digest, Healthy Life Magazine, Food, and Fitness)
- Information from Wikipedia or any wiki
- Textbooks
- Website homepages
- The weekly lesson
- Articles in healthcare and nursing-oriented trade magazines, such as Nursing Made Incredibly Easy and RNMagazine (Source What is a scholarly article.docx; Created 06/09 CK/CL Revised 02/17/11, 09/02/11 nlh/clm)
c. Can the lesson for the week be used as a scholarly source?
- Information from the weekly lesson can be cited in a posting; however, it is not to be the sole source used in the post.
d. Are resources provided from CU acceptable sources (e.g., the readings for the week)?
- Not as a sole source within the post. The textbook and/or assigned (required) articles for the week can be used, but another outside source must be cited for full credit. Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources for the purpose of discussions.
e. Are websites acceptable as scholarly resources for discussions?
- Yes, if they are documents or data cited from credible websites. Credible websites usually end in .gov or .edu; however, some .org sites that belong to professional associations (e.g., American Heart Association, National League for Nursing, American Diabetes Association) are also considered credible websites. Websites ending with .com are not to be used as scholarly resources
4. Professionalism in Communication
The post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, and is clearly relevant to the discussion topic. Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.
5. Wednesday Participation Requirement
The student provides a substantive response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course faculty (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11 59 p.m. MT of each week.
6. Total Participation Requirement
The student provides at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour.
Sample Answer
Using evidence-based projects (EBP) in nursing gives empirical knowledge to support well-informed choices. Adult vaccination is an area of nurse practitioner (NP) practice that I find fascinating and want to improve. This is important to discuss since vaccines operate in conjunction with your body’s natural defenses to assist you in developing resistance to illness effectively. This reduces your risk of developing specific diseases and associated consequences.
According to Akselbo et al. (2019), health providers such as NP are the most trustable and influential individuals when getting a vaccine. Taking prescribed immunizations can provide patients with some sense of security by safeguarding themselves against various deadly diseases like Hepatitis B-related liver cancer and cervical cancer caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV).
One of the vaccines that were developed to protect our body against infection brought by influenza viruses is the influenza vaccine, and according to Nowak et al. (2018), adult vaccination rates for seasonal influenza have been stable since 2013 and are much below the federal government’s 70% objective. Also, 19.2 % delayed receiving an influenza vaccine, and 29.5 % withdrew for reasons other than sickness or allergies (Nowak et al., 2018).
In this topic, I would like to discuss why getting vaccinated is essential, why patients refused vaccines, and my recommendation to resolve the issue.
As a prospective NP, I would propose standardizing processes and anticipating patient inquiries regarding vaccines. Proper health education about the vaccine is a must. Inadequate understanding might obstruct informed decision-making regarding vaccinations. Additionally, I will employ EBP skills and research results while delving into this issue. I believe EBP combined with nursing practice enables high-quality and safe nursing care.
References
- Nowak, G. J., Cacciatore, M. A., & Len-Ríos, M. E. (2018). Understanding and increasing influenza vaccination acceptance Insights from a 2016 national survey of U.S. adults. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(4), 711. https //doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1504071Links to an external site.
- Akselbo, Olufsen, V., Ingebrigtsen, O., & Aune, I. (2019). Simulation as a learning method in public health nurse education. Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.), 36(2), 226–232. https //doi.org/10.1111/phn.12560
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour