NUR 705 Discussion 5.1 Statistical Inference and Clinical Significance
University:
St. Thomas University
NUR 705 Discussion 5.1 Statistical Inference and Clinical Significance
Paper Instructions
Discussion Guidelines
Initial Post
For this discussion, you will participate in a group discussion. Choose a group and post a response to the following questions in the discussion board
- What is the difference between statistical inference and clinical significance importance?
- Why is evaluating both statistical inference and clinical significance essential to reviewing research studies? Be sure to cite support for your answer.
Response Posts
Respond to at least two classmates’ posts.
Follow the RISE Model for Meaningful Feedback (PDF) (Links to an external site.) when writing your response posts.
Submission
Post your initial and follow up responses and review full grading criteria on the Discussion 5.1 Statistical Inference and Clinical Significance page.
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour.
Sample Answer
Statistical inference is the process of making interpretations about certain populations based on statistical values, while clinical significance is much more subjective, and may be used to determine the measure of something (Anaesth, 2021). A statistical inference implies that something is happening, while the clinical significance is a measure of how much that thing is changing, measured by an expert in the field (Dahlberg et al., 2021).
Statistical data can be easily swayed depending on sample size and measure variability, so clinical significance is incredibly important to determine if the statistical information is clinically important (Anaesth, 2021). Clinical trials that are performed in large numbers are reliant on statistical information to determine credible results (Anaesth, 2021). Mostly, the two rely on each other to make relevant and reliable research study results.
- Sharma H. (2021). Statistical significance or clinical significance? A researcher’s dilemma for appropriate interpretation of research results. Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 15(4), 431–434. https //doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_158_21 (Links to an external site.)Dahlberg, S.E.,
- Korn, E. L., Le-Rademacher, J., Mandrekar, S. J. (2020). Clinical versus statistical significance in studies of thoracic malignancies. Journal of Thoracic Malignancies. 15(9), 1406-1408. https //www.jto.org/article/S1556-0864(20)30477-9
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour